Chuyển tới nội dung chính

Legal Services Ontology

Comprehensive domain knowledge for law firms, corporate legal departments, and legal technology operations.

Overview

The Legal Services ontology equips AI agents with deep understanding of legal operations:

  • Matter Management: Case intake, tracking, billing
  • Document Automation: Contract drafting, review, analysis
  • Client Services: Intake, communication, status updates
  • Compliance: Ethics, conflicts, trust accounting
  • Knowledge Management: Precedents, research, expertise

Ontology Layers

Role Layer

roles:
- name: Client Intake Agent
responsibilities:
- Process new client inquiries
- Gather case information
- Perform conflicts checks
- Schedule consultations
permissions:
- read: contacts, matters, conflicts_db
- execute: create_contact, schedule_meeting, run_conflict_check

- name: Legal Research Agent
responsibilities:
- Search legal databases
- Summarize case law
- Draft research memos
- Track regulatory changes
permissions:
- read: legal_databases, precedents, matter_files
- execute: search_westlaw, search_lexis, draft_memo

- name: Contract Review Agent
responsibilities:
- Extract key terms
- Compare to standards
- Flag risk provisions
- Track obligations
permissions:
- read: contracts, playbook, templates
- execute: extract_terms, flag_deviation, create_summary

Domain Layer

Key Entities

EntityDescriptionKey Attributes
MatterLegal engagementNumber, Type, Status, Client, Attorney
ClientLegal consumerID, Name, Type, Matters, Billing
DocumentLegal documentID, Type, Version, Status, Matter
ContractAgreementID, Parties, Terms, Obligations, Expiry
Time EntryBillable workID, Attorney, Matter, Hours, Description
InvoiceBillingNumber, Matter, Amount, Status

Entity Relationships

erDiagram
CLIENT ||--o{ MATTER : retains_for
MATTER ||--o{ DOCUMENT : contains
MATTER ||--o{ TIME_ENTRY : records
MATTER ||--o{ INVOICE : generates
ATTORNEY ||--o{ TIME_ENTRY : bills
ATTORNEY ||--o{ MATTER : works_on
CONTRACT ||--o{ OBLIGATION : contains

Interaction Layer

Common Workflows

Client Intake
sequenceDiagram
participant P as Prospect
participant A as Agent
participant S as System
participant L as Attorney

P->>A: Inquiry Received
A->>A: Gather Details
A->>S: Conflict Check
S-->>A: Clear/Conflict
A->>A: Risk Assessment
A->>L: Route for Review
L-->>A: Accept/Decline
A->>P: Engagement Letter
P->>A: Signed Agreement
A->>S: Open Matter
Contract Review
graph LR
A[Contract Received] --> B[Extract Terms]
B --> C[Compare to Playbook]
C --> D{Deviations?}
D -->|Yes| E[Flag Issues]
D -->|No| F[Approve]
E --> G[Attorney Review]
G --> H{Negotiate?}
H -->|Yes| I[Send Redlines]
H -->|No| F
F --> J[Execute]

Practice Areas

PracticeKey ActivitiesAgent Support
CorporateM&A, securities, governanceDue diligence, document review
LitigationDiscovery, motions, trialResearch, deadline tracking
Real EstateTransactions, leasingTitle review, closing checklists
IPPatents, trademarksPrior art search, portfolio management
EmploymentHR compliance, disputesPolicy review, investigation support

Regulatory & Ethics

RuleScopeAgent Safeguards
Attorney-Client PrivilegeAll communicationsNever disclose privileged info
Conflicts of InterestNew mattersMandatory conflict checks
Trust AccountingClient fundsSegregation, audit trails
Unauthorized PracticeLegal adviceClear disclaimers, attorney review
Data SecurityClient dataEncryption, access controls

Prompt Templates

Client Intake

You are a client intake agent for {firm_name}.

Inquiry Details:
- Contact: {contact_name}
- Source: {referral_source}
- Matter Type: {matter_type}
- Description: {description}

Gather:
1. Full contact information
2. Adverse parties (for conflicts)
3. Key dates and deadlines
4. Desired outcome
5. Budget expectations

Important:
- Do NOT provide legal advice
- Note: "This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship"
- Flag urgent deadlines (statutes of limitations)
- Route to appropriate practice group

Contract Analysis

You are a contract review agent analyzing an agreement.

Contract Type: {contract_type}
Parties: {parties}
Key Terms Requested: {terms_to_extract}

Standard Playbook Position:
{playbook_terms}

Extract and analyze:
1. Identified terms vs. playbook standards
2. Risk provisions (indemnification, limitation of liability)
3. Unusual or non-standard clauses
4. Missing standard protections
5. Key dates and obligations

Format output as a comparison table with risk ratings (Low/Medium/High).
You are a legal research agent supporting {matter_name}.

Research Question: {question}
Jurisdiction: {jurisdiction}
Practice Area: {practice_area}

Search Strategy:
1. Identify relevant statutes and regulations
2. Find controlling case law
3. Note recent developments
4. Identify contrary authority

Output format:
- Issue statement
- Short answer
- Discussion with citations
- Conclusion
- Recommended next steps

Integration Points

Practice Management

SystemCapabilitiesAgent Actions
ClioFull PM suiteMatters, time, billing
PracticePantherCloud PMCalendar, tasks, documents
MyCaseClient portalCommunications, payments
PlatformCoverageAgent Use
WestlawComprehensive US lawCase research, statutes
LexisNexisLegal and businessResearch, due diligence
FastcaseCase lawBudget-friendly research

Document Automation

ToolFunctionAgent Integration
DocuSignE-signaturesExecution workflows
Contract ExpressDocument assemblyTemplate generation
KiraAI contract reviewExtraction, analysis

Metrics & KPIs

MetricDescriptionAgent Monitoring
Utilization RateBillable / available hoursTarget > 70%
Realization RateCollected / billedAlert if < 90%
Matter Cycle TimeDays to completionTrack by type
Client SatisfactionSurvey scoresAlert if < 85%
Deadline ComplianceOn-time filingsMust be 100%

Sample Agent Configuration

const legalAgent = {
name: "Client Services",
ontology: "legal-v1",
autonomyLevel: "L1", // Assisted - legal requires attorney oversight

capabilities: {
clientIntake: true,
conflictChecks: true,
calendarManagement: true,
documentDrafting: false // Requires attorney approval
},

guardrails: {
requireApprovalFor: [
"any_client_communication",
"document_filing",
"billing_adjustment"
],
blockedActions: [
"legal_advice",
"case_strategy",
"settlement_offers"
],
disclaimers: {
required: true,
text: "This communication does not constitute legal advice."
}
},

integrations: [
"clio_manage",
"westlaw",
"docusign"
]
};

Unauthorized Practice of Law

Legal AI agents must never provide legal advice or make strategic legal decisions. All substantive outputs require attorney review before client communication.

Getting Started

To deploy a Legal Services agent:

  1. Select the Legal ontology during workspace setup
  2. Configure practice management integration
  3. Set up conflict check database
  4. Enable mandatory attorney review workflows
  5. Start with L1 (Assisted) autonomy